![]() ![]() The operation time was significantly shorter in group I (93 ± 11 min) compared with group II (138 ± 17 min) (P = 0.03). Patients with bilateral UDT had one incision in group I and five skin incisions in group II. Children with unilateral UDT and hypospadias had one incision in group I and three skin incisions in group II. Early and late complications, surgical time, hospital stay, and cosmetic results were recorded. For hypospadias reconstruction, all patients had classical subcoronal and para urethral plate incision with penile skin degloving according to the location of urethral meatus. In group II (N = 27), multi- incision technique was applied for classical orchiopexy and hypospadias surgery. In group I (N = 34) single subcoronal incision with no scrotal skin incision was applied. ![]() From one thousand and twenty-one children with hypospadias, 61 patients presented with concomitant palpable UDT and hypospadias. To introduce the creation of subdartos muscle scrotal pouch with no scrotal skin incision. ![]() To present the feasibility of no skin incision orchiopexy in children with concomitant hypospadias and undescended testis (UDT) by a single subcoronal incision technique. Sabetkish, Shabnam Kajbafzadeh, Abdol-Mohammad Sabetkish, Nastaran Hypospadias and concomitant undescended testis: Comparison of no skin incision with inguinal and scrotal skin incision orchiopexy. Electrocautery is a safe and effective method for performing surgical skin incisions. A trend toward less incisional blood loss from skin incisions made with electrocautery was noted. Electrocautery significantly reduced the incision time and postoperative wound pain. No significant difference in wound infection rates or scar cosmesis was identified between the treatment groups. Six RCTs were identified comparing electrocautery (n = 606) and a scalpel (n = 628) for skin incisions. A systematic electronic literature search was performed using 2 electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed), and the methodological quality of included publications was evaluated. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare skin incisions made by electrocautery and a scalpel. The use of electrocautery for this purpose has been controversial with respect to patient safety and surgical efficacy. The creation of surgical skin incisions has historically been performed using a cold scalpel. Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |